Argument from poor design

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Deleted section copied from the same source as http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?p=6084940)
m
Line 2: Line 2:
 
== Examples of poor design ==
 
== Examples of poor design ==
  
We conclude that this argument efficiently proves the non-existence of God. If the natural world is perfect then God exists. If it is imperfect then the the counter-argument- if it's bad design, it's a result of the Fall (Genesis 3:16 has God saying to Eve "I will increase your trouble in pregnancy")- leads to the unfalsifiability of ID theory.
+
We conclude that this argument efficiently proves the non-existence of God. If the natural world is perfect then God exists. If it is imperfect then the counter-argument- if it's bad design, it's a result of the Fall (Genesis 3:16 has God saying to Eve "I will increase your trouble in pregnancy")- leads to the unfalsifiability of ID theory.

Revision as of 18:44, 15 July 2010

Examples of poor design

We conclude that this argument efficiently proves the non-existence of God. If the natural world is perfect then God exists. If it is imperfect then the counter-argument- if it's bad design, it's a result of the Fall (Genesis 3:16 has God saying to Eve "I will increase your trouble in pregnancy")- leads to the unfalsifiability of ID theory.

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
wiki navigation
IronChariots.Org
Toolbox