Argument from poor design
(Difference between revisions)
(Deleted section copied from the same source as http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?p=6084940) |
Daemonowner (Talk | contribs) m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Examples of poor design == | == Examples of poor design == | ||
| − | We conclude that this argument efficiently proves the non-existence of God. If the natural world is perfect then God exists. If it is imperfect then | + | We conclude that this argument efficiently proves the non-existence of God. If the natural world is perfect then God exists. If it is imperfect then the counter-argument- if it's bad design, it's a result of the Fall (Genesis 3:16 has God saying to Eve "I will increase your trouble in pregnancy")- leads to the unfalsifiability of ID theory. |
Revision as of 18:44, 15 July 2010
Examples of poor design
We conclude that this argument efficiently proves the non-existence of God. If the natural world is perfect then God exists. If it is imperfect then the counter-argument- if it's bad design, it's a result of the Fall (Genesis 3:16 has God saying to Eve "I will increase your trouble in pregnancy")- leads to the unfalsifiability of ID theory.
